INPUT 01
Input 01
Specific topic and the approved teaching material or key knowledge
Prepare low-stakes recall questions, answer notes and a classroom delivery plan from the topic and knowledge students have actually been taught.
Preparing a short revision activity or quiz starter to reveal gaps in previously taught material.
The teacher must check every answer against the supplied material and adjust scaffolding. Source research claims and timing suggestions are publisher guidance, not Fieldwork-tested learning outcomes. Avoid identifiable student profiles and do not use this as a high-stakes grading workflow.
Fieldwork preparation plan adapted from the pinned publisher workflow. Read the complete pinned source before use.
The guidance below adds task-specific review limits and replaces silent defaults with explicit supplied context. It is a preparation plan, not a report of an executed skill.
Adapted from Gareth Manning’s retrieval-practice-generator. Fieldwork changed the task summary, preparation steps, review limits and starter prompt. This listing’s adapted task guidance and prompt are licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0; this applies to those materials, not unrelated site content.
Provide the precise topic, year level, question count and taught content. State missing timing or learner context rather than allowing the source defaults to stand as known facts.
Request free recall, cued recall and any justified recognition questions. Label what each question targets and adapt language and support to the actual learners.
Check answer notes against the teaching material, remove questions that reveal their own answer, and have the teacher choose timing and feedback arrangements.
Fieldwork task guidance updated 2026-10-20. Publisher source inspection remains dated 2026-10-20; independent execution testing has not been performed.
Gather the material before running the prompt. Follow the publisher’s full checklist for the specific task.
INPUT 01
Specific topic and the approved teaching material or key knowledge
INPUT 02
Student year level, prior knowledge and requested question count
INPUT 03
Time since teaching, known misconceptions and de-identified accessibility needs
Publisher excerpt: “Generate retrieval practice questions at varied difficulty levels for a topic or concept. Use when creating quiz starters,…” Source ↗
A question set labelled by retrieval type, answer notes, suggested timing and a short teacher delivery script.
Specific topic and the approved teaching material or key knowledge; Student year level, prior knowledge and requested question count; Time since teaching, known misconceptions and de-identified accessibility needs
Manually answer each question from the approved material and check accessibility. Treat spacing and difficulty as teacher-reviewed suggestions, not established effects for this class.
Use a small, permitted sample and compare the result with a reviewed baseline. This plan does not claim the publisher’s skill has been run or measured by Fieldwork.
Claude: follow the publisher’s Claude or Claude Code installation path. Preserve the complete skill folder and supporting references; configure required tools before trying the prompt.
ChatGPT: manual instruction adaptation. Read the source, supply the required context and files, and configure available tools yourself. This is not a native ChatGPT plugin installation.
STEP 01
Inspect the pinned source and licence notice before use.
STEP 02
For a compatible Agent Skills host, use the complete folder; for ChatGPT, supply the instruction file manually and use the starter prompt.
STEP 03
Provide the named inputs and confirm the task-specific limits before drafting.
STEP 04
Review a small permitted sample before applying the workflow to live work.
Published as an Agent Skills instruction file for compatible Claude setups. ChatGPT use is a manual prompt/instruction adaptation, not a native installation or publisher-tested execution. No Fieldwork execution test was performed.
Supply the actual Australian curriculum or training framework and year level. Educator review is required; this is not a curriculum-compliance certification.
Named tools: See publisher notes. Actual access depends on your setup.
Pinned source and complete folder inspected on 20 October 2026. No installation, script execution or independently measured result.
Public instructions do not imply free access to AI products, apps or APIs.
Pinned publisher workflow: https://github.com/GarethManning/education-agent-skills/blob/6bbbce418f82e11044009c9f3b7373a354de5bd0/skills/memory-learning-science/retrieval-practice-generator/SKILL.md Task: Prepare retrieval-practice questions. Use the complete source instructions, subject to the task-specific review limits below. Supply: - Specific topic and the approved teaching material or key knowledge - Student year level, prior knowledge and requested question count - Time since teaching, known misconceptions and de-identified accessibility needs First identify missing evidence and ask for it rather than assuming defaults. Use only authorised materials. Preparation sequence: 1. Bound the topic: Provide the precise topic, year level, question count and taught content. State missing timing or learner context rather than allowing the source defaults to stand as known facts. 2. Vary the retrieval demand: Request free recall, cued recall and any justified recognition questions. Label what each question targets and adapt language and support to the actual learners. 3. Verify answers and delivery: Check answer notes against the teaching material, remove questions that reveal their own answer, and have the teacher choose timing and feedback arrangements. Return: A question set labelled by retrieval type, answer notes, suggested timing and a short teacher delivery script. Review limits: The teacher must check every answer against the supplied material and adjust scaffolding. Source research claims and timing suggestions are publisher guidance, not Fieldwork-tested learning outcomes. Avoid identifiable student profiles and do not use this as a high-stakes grading workflow. First-trial check: Manually answer each question from the approved material and check accessibility. Treat spacing and difficulty as teacher-reviewed suggestions, not established effects for this class. Separate supplied facts, calculations, assumptions and unresolved questions. Do not invent examples, measured results or access. Return the draft here for human review; do not send, publish, change records or make purchases. If the source or required evidence is unavailable, state the limit. Attribution and reuse: Adapted from Gareth Manning’s retrieval-practice-generator. Fieldwork changed the task summary, preparation steps, review limits and starter prompt. This listing’s adapted task guidance and prompt are licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0; this applies to those materials, not unrelated site content. Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Copyright and permission notice: https://findaiskills.com.au/source-licences/gareth-manning-cc-by-sa-4.0.txt
Fieldwork’s starter prompt. Keep the complete publisher workflow and replace the brackets before use.
Manually answer each question from the approved material and check accessibility. Treat spacing and difficulty as teacher-reviewed suggestions, not established effects for this class. The teacher must check every answer against the supplied material and adjust scaffolding. Source research claims and timing suggestions are publisher guidance, not Fieldwork-tested learning outcomes. Avoid identifiable student profiles and do not use this as a high-stakes grading workflow.
Read the related practical guide →
This is a source-inspected starting point. Fieldwork has not run-tested this skill or measured time savings.