INPUT 01
Input 01
Desired learning outcomes and the actual curriculum or training framework
Connect learning outcomes, assessment evidence and a sequenced unit plan, then check that every activity serves an intended learning goal.
Planning a new unit or revising a unit whose activities and assessment no longer match its intended outcomes.
A unit structure does not supply complete lesson plans or establish curriculum compliance. An educator must verify the supplied standards, assessment validity, resource rights and accessibility. Do not infer student needs from a generic class profile.
Fieldwork preparation plan adapted from the pinned publisher workflow. Read the complete pinned source before use.
The guidance below adds task-specific review limits and replaces silent defaults with explicit supplied context. It is a preparation plan, not a report of an executed skill.
Adapted from Gareth Manning’s backwards-design-unit-planner. Fieldwork changed the task summary, preparation steps, review limits and starter prompt. This listing’s adapted task guidance and prompt are licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0; this applies to those materials, not unrelated site content.
Supply observable outcomes, year level and duration. Include the actual framework and available resources; mark missing context rather than accepting silent defaults.
Describe what students would do or produce to demonstrate each outcome. Check that the assessment can reveal understanding rather than only recall.
Build the learning sequence around the evidence. Trace each activity and assessment back to an outcome, then have an educator review feasibility and access.
Fieldwork task guidance updated 2026-10-20. Publisher source inspection remains dated 2026-10-20; independent execution testing has not been performed.
Gather the material before running the prompt. Follow the publisher’s full checklist for the specific task.
INPUT 01
Desired learning outcomes and the actual curriculum or training framework
INPUT 02
Year level, prior knowledge and the number of lessons or weeks
INPUT 03
Available resources and de-identified accessibility or learning-support needs
Publisher excerpt: “Plan a unit using backwards design from desired outcomes through assessment evidence to learning activities. Use when starting…” Source ↗
A three-stage unit plan with understandings, assessment evidence, sequenced learning activities and an outcome-to-assessment alignment check.
Desired learning outcomes and the actual curriculum or training framework; Year level, prior knowledge and the number of lessons or weeks; Available resources and de-identified accessibility or learning-support needs
Trace one outcome through the assessment and activities. Confirm timing and resources with the teacher; do not claim a learning gain from a draft plan.
Use a small, permitted sample and compare the result with a reviewed baseline. This plan does not claim the publisher’s skill has been run or measured by Fieldwork.
Claude: follow the publisher’s Claude or Claude Code installation path. Preserve the complete skill folder and supporting references; configure required tools before trying the prompt.
ChatGPT: manual instruction adaptation. Read the source, supply the required context and files, and configure available tools yourself. This is not a native ChatGPT plugin installation.
STEP 01
Inspect the pinned source and licence notice before use.
STEP 02
For a compatible Agent Skills host, use the complete folder; for ChatGPT, supply the instruction file manually and use the starter prompt.
STEP 03
Provide the named inputs and confirm the task-specific limits before drafting.
STEP 04
Review a small permitted sample before applying the workflow to live work.
Published as an Agent Skills instruction file for compatible Claude setups. ChatGPT use is a manual prompt/instruction adaptation, not a native installation or publisher-tested execution. No Fieldwork execution test was performed.
Supply the actual Australian curriculum or training framework and year level. Educator review is required; this is not a curriculum-compliance certification.
Named tools: See publisher notes. Actual access depends on your setup.
Pinned source and complete folder inspected on 20 October 2026. No installation, script execution or independently measured result.
Public instructions do not imply free access to AI products, apps or APIs.
Pinned publisher workflow: https://github.com/GarethManning/education-agent-skills/blob/6bbbce418f82e11044009c9f3b7373a354de5bd0/skills/curriculum-assessment/backwards-design-unit-planner/SKILL.md Task: Design a teaching unit from learning outcomes. Use the complete source instructions, subject to the task-specific review limits below. Supply: - Desired learning outcomes and the actual curriculum or training framework - Year level, prior knowledge and the number of lessons or weeks - Available resources and de-identified accessibility or learning-support needs First identify missing evidence and ask for it rather than assuming defaults. Use only authorised materials. Preparation sequence: 1. Set the learning destination: Supply observable outcomes, year level and duration. Include the actual framework and available resources; mark missing context rather than accepting silent defaults. 2. Choose evidence before activities: Describe what students would do or produce to demonstrate each outcome. Check that the assessment can reveal understanding rather than only recall. 3. Sequence and check alignment: Build the learning sequence around the evidence. Trace each activity and assessment back to an outcome, then have an educator review feasibility and access. Return: A three-stage unit plan with understandings, assessment evidence, sequenced learning activities and an outcome-to-assessment alignment check. Review limits: A unit structure does not supply complete lesson plans or establish curriculum compliance. An educator must verify the supplied standards, assessment validity, resource rights and accessibility. Do not infer student needs from a generic class profile. First-trial check: Trace one outcome through the assessment and activities. Confirm timing and resources with the teacher; do not claim a learning gain from a draft plan. Separate supplied facts, calculations, assumptions and unresolved questions. Do not invent examples, measured results or access. Return the draft here for human review; do not send, publish, change records or make purchases. If the source or required evidence is unavailable, state the limit. Attribution and reuse: Adapted from Gareth Manning’s backwards-design-unit-planner. Fieldwork changed the task summary, preparation steps, review limits and starter prompt. This listing’s adapted task guidance and prompt are licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0; this applies to those materials, not unrelated site content. Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Copyright and permission notice: https://findaiskills.com.au/source-licences/gareth-manning-cc-by-sa-4.0.txt
Fieldwork’s starter prompt. Keep the complete publisher workflow and replace the brackets before use.
Trace one outcome through the assessment and activities. Confirm timing and resources with the teacher; do not claim a learning gain from a draft plan. A unit structure does not supply complete lesson plans or establish curriculum compliance. An educator must verify the supplied standards, assessment validity, resource rights and accessibility. Do not infer student needs from a generic class profile.
Read the related practical guide →
This is a source-inspected starting point. Fieldwork has not run-tested this skill or measured time savings.