Legal services
Brief
A source-backed brief workflow for legal services. Review its inputs, setup and geographic limits before your first draft.
Claude · ChatGPT
LEGAL SERVICES / REVIEW
Prepare a structured first pass for qualified counsel.
01 / WHAT TO TRY
Publisher description excerpt: “Review a contract against your organization's negotiation playbook — flag deviations, generate redlines, provide business impact analysis. Use…” Source ↗
These are Fieldwork’s preparation notes. Follow the source’s full input checklist for the specific task.
A clause-level issues list and draft redline suggestions.
This is a source-inspected starting point. Fieldwork has not run-tested this skill or measured time savings.
02 / CHECK THE FIT
Claude
Publisher documents a Claude/Agent Skills setup. Review the complete pack and its current installation instructions.
Geography-neutral workflow. Set Australian spelling, AUD, dates and business context explicitly; local compliance is not supplied by this label.
No named business app was detected in the inspected instructions.
Public instructions do not imply free access to Claude, ChatGPT, paid apps, API usage or generation services.
03 / SET IT UP
Pinned source snapshot; review publisher release and installation notes.
Platform-by-platform setup guide →04 / YOUR FIRST DRAFT
Replace the brackets and supply the required inputs. This prompt is Fieldwork’s example, not a tested guarantee or a replacement for installation.
Use review-contract on the attached contract against this approved playbook. We act for [party] in [jurisdiction]. Cite the clause for each issue, distinguish playbook deviations from assumptions, and stage all proposed edits for counsel review.Download prompt ↓
A legal professional must review all analysis and redlines. The workflow does not establish enforceability or provide legal advice.