Legal services
Brief
A source-backed brief workflow for legal services. Review its inputs, setup and geographic limits before your first draft.
Claude · ChatGPT
Anthropic
THE COLLECTION / SOURCE-INSPECTED RESOURCES
AI skills for legal services
A starting point for the work before the review. Compare relevant Claude, ChatGPT and Codex workflows, with source evidence and practical setup notes.
9 workflows · Source checks: 18 October 2026
Browse workflows
Saved on this browser only. Browse everything →
Legal services
Compliance check
A source-backed compliance check workflow for legal services. Review its inputs, setup and geographic limits before your first draft.
Claude · ChatGPT
Anthropic
Legal services
Legal response
A source-backed legal response workflow for legal services. Review its inputs, setup and geographic limits before your first draft.
Claude
Anthropic
Legal services
Structure an initial legal risk brief
Make the facts, uncertainties, and escalation questions easier to review.
Claude · ChatGPT
Anthropic
Legal services
Prepare the legal meeting brief
Organize the documents, open issues, and decisions before the call.
Claude · ChatGPT
Anthropic
Legal services
Review a contract against your playbook
Prepare a structured first pass for qualified counsel.
Claude
Anthropic
Legal services
Signature request
A source-backed signature request workflow for legal services. Review its inputs, setup and geographic limits before your first draft.
Claude
Anthropic
Legal services
Give incoming NDAs a first pass
Sort screening issues before they reach the appropriate reviewer.
Claude · ChatGPT
Anthropic
Legal services
Vendor check
A source-backed vendor check workflow for legal services. Review its inputs, setup and geographic limits before your first draft.
Claude
Anthropic
No matching workflows.
Try a different task or broaden the filters.
Platform labels distinguish installed skills from manual instruction adaptations. Read each setup note.
Choose a useful starting point.
A starting point for the work before the review. Compare relevant Claude, ChatGPT and Codex workflows, with source evidence and practical setup notes. Match the source’s intended task to the records you already have. Each listing states its publisher, source revision, dependencies, geographic fit, and review limits. Where a skill uses local scripts or connected apps, the complete setup matters.
Australian-context labels mean the source explicitly discusses Australia. Worldwide labels describe broadly portable work, not universal legal or regulatory suitability. “Local review needed” highlights material country-specific assumptions. ChatGPT instruction adaptations need manual setup and validation; a Claude or Codex plugin is not automatically a native ChatGPT installation.
How to choose and check your first workflow →