Pinned publisher workflow: https://github.com/SkillMedev/skills/blob/97a13607d669157a4a16d5ba79b77f208319f7b9/skills/nonprofit-board-pack/SKILL.md

Task: Prepare a nonprofit board meeting pack.
Use the complete source instructions, subject to the task-specific review limits below.

Supply:
- Approved financials, budget comparisons and dated programme metrics with definitions
- Fundraising pipeline and giving records with evidence and confidentiality limits
- Meeting purpose, board rules, required decisions, approval owner and distribution timetable

First identify missing evidence and ask for it rather than assuming defaults. Use only authorised materials.

Preparation sequence:
1. Reconcile the dashboard: Agree reporting dates, metric definitions, restricted funds and actual-versus-budget figures. Label estimates and link each number to an approved source; leave unknowns visible.
2. Prepare the decision material: Draft options and tradeoffs for the board’s actual decision. Propose routine consent items only where the board rules allow them; flag contested or conflicted items for separate review.
3. Review the pack and agenda: Name each board ask and date, reconcile narrative claims to the dashboard, and have the authorised owner approve confidentiality, thresholds and circulation.

Return: A draft board pack with a source-linked dashboard, proposed consent items, decision memo, board asks and matching meeting agenda.
Review limits: The publisher’s one-decision structure, three-month runway trigger, pipeline ratios and advance-send timing are heuristics, not governance requirements. Use the board’s approved rules and thresholds. Do not copy fictional publisher outcomes or infer unrestricted cash from total cash.
First-trial check: Reconcile every dashboard figure to the approved records and have the board secretary check the agenda against the organisation’s rules. Do not distribute the draft or invent impact measures.

Separate supplied facts, calculations, assumptions and unresolved questions. Do not invent examples, measured results or access. Return the draft here for human review; do not send, publish, change records or make purchases. If the source or required evidence is unavailable, state the limit.

Attribution and reuse: Adapted from Skill Me / Alexander Ouellet’s nonprofit-board-pack. Fieldwork changed the task summary, preparation steps, review limits and starter prompt. Publisher source is MIT licensed; the copyright and permission notice is retained in the linked licence file.
Licence: https://github.com/SkillMedev/skills/blob/97a13607d669157a4a16d5ba79b77f208319f7b9/LICENSE
Copyright and permission notice: https://findaiskills.com.au/source-licences/skillme-mit.txt

Review: Reconcile every dashboard figure to the approved records and have the board secretary check the agenda against the organisation’s rules. Do not distribute the draft or invent impact measures. The publisher’s one-decision structure, three-month runway trigger, pipeline ratios and advance-send timing are heuristics, not governance requirements. Use the board’s approved rules and thresholds. Do not copy fictional publisher outcomes or infer unrestricted cash from total cash.
Source: https://github.com/SkillMedev/skills/blob/97a13607d669157a4a16d5ba79b77f208319f7b9/skills/nonprofit-board-pack/SKILL.md
Source inspected 2026-10-20. Not run-tested.