Pinned publisher workflow: https://github.com/GarethManning/education-agent-skills/blob/6bbbce418f82e11044009c9f3b7373a354de5bd0/skills/curriculum-assessment/criterion-referenced-rubric-generator/SKILL.md

Task: Build a criterion-referenced assessment rubric.
Use the complete source instructions, subject to the task-specific review limits below.

Supply:
- Learning objective and the exact assessment task
- Student year level, subject and applicable assessment framework
- Approved criteria, number of performance levels and permitted calibration samples

First identify missing evidence and ask for it rather than assuming defaults. Use only authorised materials.

Preparation sequence:
1. Define the evidence to assess: Supply the task, objective and student level. Agree the criteria and performance levels before drafting; keep unrelated presentation preferences out unless they are assessed outcomes.
2. Describe observable differences: Draft each criterion separately with concrete evidence for each level. Check that adjacent levels differ in demonstrated performance rather than adjectives alone.
3. Calibrate before use: Compare the draft against permitted samples and discuss ambiguous cases with markers. Review the student version and revise inconsistent descriptors before marking live work.

Return: An assessment rubric, criterion rationale, student-friendly version and marker-calibration notes for educator review.
Review limits: A generated rubric is not a validated grading instrument. Educators decide criteria, weightings, fairness and accommodations. The publisher directs Manning competency programmes to a different companion skill; this listing covers general curriculum tasks.
First-trial check: Ask two educators to discuss the same permitted sample against the draft. Record disagreement and revise descriptors; do not invent calibration scores or reliability measures.

Separate supplied facts, calculations, assumptions and unresolved questions. Do not invent examples, measured results or access. Return the draft here for human review; do not send, publish, change records or make purchases. If the source or required evidence is unavailable, state the limit.

Attribution and reuse: Adapted from Gareth Manning’s criterion-referenced-rubric-generator. Fieldwork changed the task summary, preparation steps, review limits and starter prompt. This listing’s adapted task guidance and prompt are licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0; this applies to those materials, not unrelated site content.
Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Copyright and permission notice: https://findaiskills.com.au/source-licences/gareth-manning-cc-by-sa-4.0.txt

Review: Ask two educators to discuss the same permitted sample against the draft. Record disagreement and revise descriptors; do not invent calibration scores or reliability measures. A generated rubric is not a validated grading instrument. Educators decide criteria, weightings, fairness and accommodations. The publisher directs Manning competency programmes to a different companion skill; this listing covers general curriculum tasks.
Source: https://github.com/GarethManning/education-agent-skills/blob/6bbbce418f82e11044009c9f3b7373a354de5bd0/skills/curriculum-assessment/criterion-referenced-rubric-generator/SKILL.md
Source inspected 2026-10-20. Not run-tested.